Compare to
Discover how Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and Meta's Llama 3 8B Instruct stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI
				language models.
				
				Released in March 2025 and April 2024 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence,
				with Gemini 2.5 Pro offering a 1,000,000-token context
				window and Llama 3 8B Instruct featuring a 8,000-token
				capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their
				benchmark performances, with Gemini 2.5 Pro achieving 81.7%
				on MMLU and Llama 3 8B Instruct scoring 68.4%, making this comparison essential for developers and organizations seeking the right AI
				solution for their specific needs.
Models Overview
| ProviderCompany that developed the model | Meta | |
| Context LengthMaximum number of tokens the model can process | 1M | 8000 | 
| Maximum OutputMaximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response | 64K | 2048 | 
| Release DateDate when the model was released | 25-03-2025 | 18-04-2024 | 
| Knowledge CutoffTraining data cutoff date | January 2025 | December 2023 | 
| Open SourceWhether the model's code is open-source | FALSE | TRUE | 
| API ProvidersAPI providers that offer access to the model | Vertex AI | Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, NVIDIA NIM, IBM watsonx, Hugging Face | 
Pricing Comparison
Compare the pricing of Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and Meta's Llama 3 8B Instruct to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.
| Input CostCost per million input tokens | $1.25 / 1M tokens | Pricing not available | 
| Output CostCost per million tokens generated | $10 / 1M tokens | Pricing not available | 
Comparing Benchmarks and Performance
Compare the performances of Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and Meta's Llama 3 8B Instruct on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.
| MMLUEvaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings. | 81.7% | 68.4% | 
| MMMUA wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark. | Benchmark not available | Benchmark not available | 
| HellaSwagA challenging sentence completion benchmark. | Benchmark not available | Benchmark not available | 
| GSM8KGrade-school math problems benchmark. | Benchmark not available | 79.6% | 
| HumanEvalA benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings. | Benchmark not available | 62.2% | 
| MATHBenchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines. | Benchmark not available | 30% |